The story of the Piltdown man hoax
began in 1912 when Charles Dawson found fragments of a fossil in the village of
Piltdown. After finding the first fragment, Dawson invited Arthur smith Woodward
(at the time he was England’s leading geologist), and Pierre Tielhard de Chardin
( a French paleontologist) to Piltdown. Dawson found the most interesting piece,
which was a jaw bone. This jaw bone had the shape on an ape but the teeth of a
human. At first everyone was excited because remains were found in England, but
then confusion came abroad when the Piltdown man didn’t match any of the other
remains being found in other countries. Even if people didn’t agree they were
scared to challenge it. Years later scientists
discovered that jaw actually belonged to a female orangutan and someone had made
it appear otherwise. Scientists were shocked that someone could do such a
thing. The Piltdown hoax had scientists fooled for over 40 years. In the end,
it taught scientists to be aware that people are capable of pulling something like
this off because before this event, scientists were thought of as scholars and
gentlemen.
Scientists are human, and just like
any other human, they have faults. Just as Giles Oakley stated “Egotism, pride,
ambition, rivalry, these things affect even scientific judgments.” In this
situation, these faults negatively impacted the scientific process because for
40 years scientists believed something that wasn’t true. Whether the hoax occurred
because someone was jealous that other countries were discovering remains and England
wasn’t, or because someone wanted to receive the credit, the hoax caused
scientists to be fooled for over 40 years.
The hoax began to be discovered in
1949 when scientists found a new way to figure out the date of remains. Scientists
did this by measuring the fluorine content of fossils (fluorine analysis), and
when they measured the fluorine content of the Piltdown man, the remains turned
out to be a lot younger than they expected. Then in 1953 scientists did a full scale investigation
with better dating methods. It turned out the fossil had been stained to appear
older, the parts that had been cut were cut after they were already fossilized,
and the teeth had been filed down.
I don’t think it is possible to
remove the human factor from science unless we get a bunch of robots to do it
for us. However the human factor plays a positive role because humans are naturally
curious and they question things and want to know more. If we took the human
factor away there wouldn’t be curiosity, which is one the reasons scientists do
what they do.
A life lesson we could learn from
this is not to believe everything you hear or see right off the back. Sometimes
things (or people) appear different from what (or who) they really are. It is
always important to look into things even if their face value looks real and
trustworthy. Unfortunately there are deceitful people in this world and are
capable of anything.
I think you are right about the importance of human curiosity in science. Curiosity is the reason behind all experimentation and has led to all of humanities great discoveries. I also think you make a good point in your life lesson about not taking things at face value. Science does a good job at teaching us the value of critical thinking and investigation.
ReplyDeleteIn general, good background on the hoax. What was the significance of the find? If had been valid, what would it have taught us about how humans evolved? (Hint: Check out Arthur Keith's hypothesis on human evolution.)
ReplyDeleteRegarding the faults section: I think you are letting the scientists off too easy and you need to consider the faults there. There were scientists who were skeptical of the find, but why didn't they speak up more forcefully? Scientists weren't given access to the fossils for analysis, contrary to all scientific practice. Why didn't they complain? Scientists at that time failed to do their jobs and the question is why? What motivated them to accept this fossil so readily and with so little skepticism?
Good coverage of the fluorine analysis. What qualities of the process of science itself helped to uncover the hoax? Why were they still analyzing this find 40 years later?
"If we took the human factor away there wouldn’t be curiosity, which is one the reasons scientists do what they do."
Precisely. Well said.
Good conclusion.